Breaking News
Home » Featured » Gold Leaf Tobacco boss wins property dispute

Gold Leaf Tobacco boss wins property dispute

Local business tycoon, Simon George Rudland, co-owner of Gold Leaf Tobacco Corporation, has been cleared by the High Court from any wrongdoing on allegations of transferring his business counterparty’s four properties into his firms’ names following a botched US$1 million loan agreement.
Rudland who is also co-founder of Pioneer Transport had been taken to court by a local businessman, Future Chirango Muvirimi and his wife Petronella who were seeking reversal of the transferred up-market Harare properties into Rudland’s companies’ names.
In his declaration, Muvirimi alleged that Rudland had attached his four properties which he had surrendered as surety before advancing to him the full US$1 million he had requested as loan.
Sometime in 2010, Muvirimi and his wife together with their companies namely Leonfar Investments (Pvt) Ltd, Downtown Petroleum Investments (Pvt) Ltd and Deepstar Investments (Pvt) Ltd issued summons against Ramsway Investments (Pvt) Ltd, Rudland, Leathout Investments (Pvt) Ltd, Foreghin (Pvt) Ltd, Gameso Investments (Pvt) Ltd, Metwax Properties (Pvt) Ltd and Mark Richard Stonier seeking among other things, a declaration that the acknowledgement of debt which he executed in his personal capacity and on behalf of his companies was null and void and of no force and effect.
In the same summons, Muvirimi also petitioned the court for an order for the reversal of the transfer of the four properties and payment of US$255 500 as damages for alleged loss of income together with interest after maintaining that the transfers were done without due process being followed.
Responding to the allegations, Rudland and his firms objected to Muvirimi’s claim arguing that it had prescribed at the time that the summons was served and also maintained that the acknowledgement of debt signed by Muvirimi was valid and binding adding that the full US$1 million was advanced, contrary to Muvirimi’s claims.
Rudland made an application for absolution from the instance at the close of Muvirimi’s case which application was granted by Justice Happious Zhou after he (Rudland) had maintained that the properties were validly transferred according to an agreement between the parties.
“…The claim is founded on alleged fraud and breach of contract, all of which took place in 2010 according to evidence led on behalf of the plaintiffs (Muvirimi and his firms). It is common cause that the summons in the present case was served on the defendant (Rudland and his firms) on November 17, 2015. This is all based on the evidence of the plaintiff. The period of three years had lapsed when the summons was served,” Justice Zhou said.
“No real purpose will be served by placing the defendants on their defence merely to confirm that which the plaintiff’s witness has already stated in relation to when the cause of action arose. For these reasons, based on the prescription of the debt, absolution from the instance is warranted…thus given that the plaintiffs are seeking reversion of ownership which has passed they were enjoined by law to claim it within three years from the date that the cause of action arose…their claim has therefore prescribed,” he said.
Muvirimi’s claim was dismissed with costs.



About Judith Nyuke

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Check Also

Natalie Mhandu attempt to drag Munyezas “backfire”

Jah Prazyzah video girl Natalie Melody Mhandu’s attempt to arm-twist the Munyeza family into liability ...